G
YouTube TikTok Games
Skip to content

ArSee product rebrand + engineer-correct GI headline and timestamp states - #149

Merged
masarray merged 11 commits into
masterfrom
feat/arsee-brand-trace-headline-20261111
Nov 10, 2026
Merged

masarray merged 11 commits into
masterfrom
feat/arsee-brand-trace-headline-20261111

Conversation

@masarray

@masarray masarray commented Nov 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

ArSee public product identity & source-correct Raw Frames

Branding: ArSee · Open Source IEC 60870-104/103/101 Protocol Tester is now the primary name for the Windows WPF title/header, assembly metadata, Inno installer display/shortcuts, CLI, report/capture labels, README, public English + Indonesian Pages, FAQ/docs/case studies and SEO/PWA/JSON-LD metadata.

Compatibility explicitly preserved: masarray/ARIEC60870 GitHub URLs; existing public v3.6.8-rc.3 binaries/assets and release links; CLI executable and installed ARIEC60870.exe file name; installer AppId and install directory; .ariec capture schema and established namespaces. No claim that already published RC binaries have retroactively changed.

Engineer-mode Raw Frames source hierarchy:

  • For actually decoded IEC101 GI SP frames, first line GI Data · Single-Point · Link 105 · CA 1; physical Link and ASDU CA are moved above signal values and COT, never duplicated in a lower paragraph.
  • For no object timestamp: No Timestamp only; typed CP56 valid: Timestamp Valid; typed CP56 invalid: Timestamp Invalid; CP24/other unknown-CP56 tag: Timestamp Partial. Host arrival never used to backfill device time.
  • Source-typed malformed ASDU cannot pretend to know Link/CA; clipboard output matches visible WPF row. No IEC-101 transaction/driver changes (independent draft PR P0 IEC-101: reconcile #136 and integrate shared per-link transaction/FCB core #145).

Verified exact-head Windows gates

  • Commit f2a9727d0b044fa9d317ae2a3d158989a4b911fa
  • CI Windows SUCCESS: Release warning-gated build, 866/866 xUnit across six projects, protocol smoke, real-WPF 1400-frame acceptance, Windows GUI and independent RX tool packaging.
  • CodeQL SUCCESS
  • Repository hygiene SUCCESS and dependency review SUCCESS.
  • Original Windows WPF evidence artifact ARIEC60870-OBS-C-ui-evidence: engineer-gi-first-line-link-ca.png explicitly displays GI Data · Single-Point · Link 105 · CA 1 and No Timestamp in the physically decoded row, and top header ArSee; no duplicate identity appears below.
  • dotnet format remains a non-blocking repository-wide diagnostic with pre-existing whitespace debt; do not misrepresent it as a clean formatter run.

Merge rule: source branch based on public master 59ebc36f; merge independently of draft IEC101 P0 #145. Neither this UI PR nor existing downloads certify physical SICAM FAT.

…thout duplicate label

Display GI Data · Single-Point · Link 105 · CA 1 as the actual top heading when verified. Suppress duplicate lower identity, keep physical evidence and clipboard in sync; show No Timestamp, Timestamp Valid/Invalid or partial truth. Add source-backed unit and real WPF geometry acceptance.
…ntity and README

Keep existing installer AppId, installed directory, binary filename and published ARIEC60870 artifacts to protect upgrades and old links.
…nd public guides

Leave .ariec schema, exported legacy filenames, command examples and existing GitHub release endpoints compatible.
…mpatibility mirrors

Update site titles, JSON-LD visible names, navigation and human-readable text while retaining existing GitHub Pages canonicals, release URLs and published artifact filenames.
…ene identity checks

Keep canonical GitHub Pages URLs and icon resource filenames intact while updating new public product metadata.
…lace stale time assertion

Use actual passive decoded FT1.2 GI row as WPF proof, preserve matching clipboard, add release legacy-name disclosure and brand identity guards.
@masarray
masarray marked this pull request as ready for review November 10, 2026 23:14
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ❌ Failed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ❌ Failed 2026-11-10T23:15:02.765022Z
We couldn’t complete this review. Comment @codex review to try again.
f2a9727 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@masarray
masarray merged commit 37baba3 into master Nov 10, 2026
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant