G
YouTube TikTok Games
Skip to content

docs(release): archive verified v3.6.8-rc.2 public package and WPF evidence - #139

Merged
masarray merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
docs/rc2-public-validation-evidence-20261110
Nov 10, 2026
Merged

masarray merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
docs/rc2-public-validation-evidence-20261110

Conversation

@masarray

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Published RC .2 evidence (documentation only)

  • Source/tag/release all at d33475c2d42287c8231d345198880ad55d5ad4b9.
  • Package #42768259871 succeeded: 852/852 xUnit, 19/19 protocol smoke, exact self-contained Windows EXE WPF HOLD/AUTO release gate, portable ZIP, installer, SBOM and SHA256.
  • Public release v3.6.8-rc.2 is prerelease=true / draft=false; 4 published assets, SHA-256 digests and both attestations documented.
  • Separate v3.6.7 upgrade CI proved simulated running-GUI/Master shutdown and user-data preservation on precursor master; not labeled as a physical RC .2 upgrade FAT.
  • Draft SICAM PR P0 IEC-101: serial diagnostics, FC11 response correlation and safe dual-link reliability #136 intentionally excluded; no physical 1200-bps or 2/4-COM FAT claim.

This PR only adds post-publication validation documentation. Do not rewrite release/tag, change any package code or rerun Package. Merge after the normal repository CI checks.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-10T06:32:50.996076Z a653952 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: a6539522dc

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".


## Honest field-readiness limits

- **Unmerged Draft PR #136 is excluded from this RC.** That development's stricter IEC-101 FC9/Table-10 response validation, DFC-busy recovery and 1200-bps serial timing changes have passing CI but await isolated physical SICAM A8000 versus IEC_Test A/B FAT. Do not claim those improvements were shipped in this tagged build.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Replace named commercial comparison with neutral FAT criteria

This public release-validation document names IEC_Test as a comparison product in the proposed A/B FAT. The root AGENTS.md explicitly requires public documentation to remain vendor-neutral, prohibits identifying commercial comparison products by name, and requires competitive benchmarking to stay private. Describe the pending validation using independently authored IEC-standard acceptance criteria instead, keeping named comparison details outside the public repository.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L91-L91

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@masarray
masarray merged commit 4128f04 into master Nov 10, 2026
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant