Repository navigation
Avoid duplicate source upgrades of dependencies - #24209
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Patrick Linnane <patrick@linnane.io>
Contributor
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Upgrading a formula that's also a build dependency of another outdated formula could build it from source twice: once as the dependency, then again for its own queued upgrade. The second build reused the same keg, so if it failed it deleted the working installation. The already-attempted check missed the duplicate because the queued installer still held the API-loaded formula while the dependency used the source-loaded one, and
Formula#==compares classes.Compare attempted formulae by full name and spec, as fetch deduplication already does, so the queued upgrade is skipped before its keg is unlinked.
Fixes #24203
brew benchmarkresults.brewcommands to reproduce the bug?brew lgtm(style, typechecking and tests) locally?GPT-6 Astra drafted the fix and tests and ran
brew lgtm --online; Claude Code (Opus 5.5) reviewed it, reproduced the missed duplicate with real API- and source-loaded formulae and confirmed the regression tests fail without the change and pass with it. I reviewed the diff.